Brookings Institution
View original resourceThe Brookings Institution's AI and Emerging Technology Initiative stands out as one of the most influential policy research hubs shaping America's approach to AI governance. Unlike typical academic research that stays in journals, this initiative bridges the gap between rigorous analysis and practical policymaking. Their work directly influences congressional hearings, regulatory agency decisions, and corporate governance strategies. The initiative's interdisciplinary team combines economists, technologists, legal scholars, and policy experts to tackle questions like: How should the US regulate AI without stifling innovation? What international coordination is needed? How do we address AI's impact on labor markets and national security?
What sets this initiative apart is Brookings' unique position in the Washington policy ecosystem. The institution has direct access to policymakers, regulatory agencies, and industry leaders, allowing their research to move from analysis to implementation faster than traditional academic work. Their researchers regularly testify before Congress, advise federal agencies, and participate in high-level international forums on AI governance. This isn't just theoretical research—it's research designed to become policy.
The initiative's interdisciplinary approach means they're tackling AI governance from multiple angles simultaneously: economic impact assessments, legal framework analysis, international competitiveness studies, and ethical considerations. This holistic view is crucial when dealing with a technology that touches every sector of society.
The initiative organizes its work around several core themes that reflect the most pressing AI governance challenges:
Regulatory Framework Development: Analysis of existing regulatory approaches and recommendations for new oversight mechanisms. This includes studying how traditional regulatory frameworks apply to AI and where entirely new approaches are needed.
International AI Governance: Research on global AI governance coordination, particularly US-EU cooperation and responses to authoritarian AI development models. Their work examines trade implications, standard-setting processes, and diplomatic strategies.
Economic and Labor Market Impacts: Data-driven analysis of AI's effects on employment, productivity, and economic inequality. This research directly informs policy discussions about workforce transition programs and economic adaptation strategies.
National Security and Competitiveness: Studies on AI's role in geopolitical competition, dual-use technology governance, and maintaining technological leadership while managing risks.
Sectoral Applications: Deep dives into AI governance challenges in specific sectors like healthcare, finance, transportation, and criminal justice.
Understanding how to use this resource effectively means recognizing the different types of content they produce and their intended policy impact:
Policy Briefs: Concise analyses designed for busy policymakers, typically 2-4 pages with clear recommendations. These often respond to current events or pending legislation.
Research Reports: Comprehensive studies (20-50 pages) that provide the analytical foundation for policy positions. These include original data analysis, case studies, and detailed recommendation frameworks.
Congressional Testimony: Formal statements delivered to House and Senate committees, representing the initiative's official positions on specific policy questions.
International Comparisons: Analysis of how other countries and regions are approaching AI governance, with implications for US policy choices.
Stakeholder Dialogues: Summaries of convenings with industry, civil society, and government representatives that reveal emerging consensus and ongoing disagreements.
Federal Policymakers and Staff: Congressional staff drafting AI legislation, regulatory agency personnel developing oversight frameworks, and White House officials coordinating administration AI policy will find analysis directly relevant to their work.
Corporate Policy and Compliance Teams: Companies developing AI governance strategies need to understand the policy landscape this research is helping to shape. The initiative's work often previews regulatory directions before they become formal proposals.
State and Local Government Officials: As federal AI policy develops, state and local governments need frameworks for their own AI governance. Brookings research provides models and analysis applicable to multiple government levels.
International Policy Researchers: Given the initiative's focus on global AI governance coordination, international researchers and policymakers use this work to understand US policy directions and identify cooperation opportunities.
Civil Society and Advocacy Organizations: Groups working on AI ethics, labor rights, civil liberties, and other affected areas use Brookings research to inform their own policy positions and advocacy strategies.
Academic Researchers: Scholars studying technology policy, public administration, and international relations reference this work for its empirical analysis and policy impact insights.
To effectively use the Brookings AI Initiative's work, focus on their most recent publications first—AI policy moves quickly, and their analysis is most valuable when it's current. Pay attention to who's authoring different pieces, as the initiative includes experts with different specializations and policy networks.
Look for their event transcripts and video recordings, which often capture informal insights and debate that don't appear in formal publications. Their expert interviews and panel discussions reveal the thinking behind policy positions and highlight areas of ongoing uncertainty.
Follow their citation patterns to understand which other research and data sources are most influential in AI policy circles. The initiative's bibliographies serve as curated reading lists for anyone trying to understand the broader AI governance landscape.
Finally, note the timing of their publications relative to policy calendars—congressional hearings, international summits, regulatory comment periods. This timing is usually intentional and reveals strategic thinking about when research can have maximum policy impact.
Published
2024
Jurisdiction
United States
Category
Research and academic references
Access
Public access
VerifyWise helps you implement AI governance frameworks, track compliance, and manage risk across your AI systems.